🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear talks with Washington as long as it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy worked, and disclosed recent overtures had originated from mediators to reopen negotiations with the US government. He said Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to allow the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Path

Araghchi is navigating a complex route since Iran does not want be perceived to be operating from a stance of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen stronger militarily and mentally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Talks Unexpectedly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been obliterated. Subsequently, European countries employed their privilege to restore international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was settled an local partnership with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats stated three times they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Current Position

Tehran representatives stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems very probable the offer could be reintroduced in various formats if discussions restart.

The US president recently stated he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to restart talks, but privately Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting coherent offers from the United States either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of inactivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his remarks to the gathering, aimed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the concept of international law, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict showed the clash could not be ended by combat operations. He asserted the strikes began with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and cooperation, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Remains the Ultimate Solution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had fled dialogue; it was America and the European states that had consistently tried to dictate their desires during the talks. Dialogue can still be viable and remains the ultimate resolution to resolve conflicts, but its standards, rules and tenets must be adhered to."

"If they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and respect, they will receive a response in the equivalent tone."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We acquired multiple understandings from this conflict; we have identified our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to eliminate, remains in place. The installations and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the will of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but did not succeed to break. The citizens of Tehran have grown more powerful, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the leadership and the nation in the face of this invasion."