🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an event that started out as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has developed a commercial tone, growing to encompass gatherings where African descendants are remunerated to address white audiences about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The wave has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Deutschland, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since those days, focusing less on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the celebration is commemorated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a instructive case in how co-option leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how important it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the current time in which it falls this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament gains confidence to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a source of worry. At the same time, far-right parties are growing in the EU as a whole.

In the United States, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to remove African American heritage and narrative from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month symbolises how minimally it can be impactful if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered festivities of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is needed. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month entirely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an period that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and provides room for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What use is simple recognition of the past when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Establishments who mark it should not be reassured with the passive language of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but faced with the threats that face all if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.